Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the F.I.R. lodged by opposite party no. 2 is based on total false and frivolous allegation; infact she was very much against the marriage and she left matrimonial home in August, 2019 and then applicant no. 1 moved an application u/s 9 of Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights in the civil court, therefore, the alleged incident, which is stated to have take place on 3.11.2019 wherein the applicants belonging to same family went to the house of the opposite party no. 2 and assaulting her, does not appear to be probable; he has further argued that the applicant no. 1 is the husband, applicant no. 2 is Jeth, applicant no. 3 is mother-in-law, applicant no. 4 is uncle-in-law and applicant no. 5 is father in law; he has argued that medical report of opposite party no. 2 is procured one and all injuries are simple in nature. The matter needs deeper and fairer investigation before any arrest should be given effect to. Therefore, the applicants may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
