The court dismissed the applicant's anticipatory bail application as not pressed, granting liberty to file a fresh application before the Sessions Court based on a prior judgment.
Liberty to file fresh anticipatory bail application before Sessions Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1129 of 2020
Applicant :- Devendra Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jata Shankar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Present anticipatory bail application has been filed directly before this Court. Learned counsel for the applicant has prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to file fresh before the Sessions court.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh before Sessions Court in view of judgement passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 53729 of 2019 (Vinod Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and Another) vide order dated 6.12.2019.
Office is directed to return certified copy of F.I.R. to learned counsel for the applicant.
Order Date :- 7.2.2020 Dhirendra/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Devendra Yadav
Rajul Bhargava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
