Application under Section 482 CrPC filed for expeditious decision of a bail petition by applicant was dismissed as infructuous since the bail had already been decided, and for want of prosecution due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 867 of 2020
Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Vakalatnama filed today by Shri Hemendra Pratap Singh, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record.
This application u/s 482 CrPC has been filed seeking a direction to the Court below to decide the bail no. 3922 of 2019 arising out of case crime no. 241 of 2015 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 364 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, pending before District and Sessions Judge, Mathura, expeditiously within stipulated period.
None is present for the applicant.
Heard Shri H.P. Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and the learned AGA.
Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 states that bail application of the applicant moved before the Trial Court has been decided, therefore, the present application has become infructuous.
Since none is present for the applicant to press this application nor any request for adjournment has been made, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 9.1.2020
safi
Dinesh Kumar
State of U.P.
Om Prakash-VII
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
