The High Court refused to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. due to factual disputes. It directed surrender within 30 days for speedy bail consideration and restrained coercive measures during that period.
Quash of charge sheet refused; surrender directed within 30 days for bail; no coercive measures for 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 584 of 2020
Applicant :- Kuldeep Singh Negi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anshul Pathak,Rahul Singh Dahiya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided, if possible on the same day, in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Order Date :- 17.1.2020 JK Yadav
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the charge sheet discloses an offence against the applicant warranting quashing of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Whether coercive measures can be restrained against the applicant for a specified period.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of PunjabExplained¶8
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866 · Who else cites this
State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan LalExplained¶8
State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426 · Who else cites this
State of Bihar Vs. P.P.SharmaExplained¶8
State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 · Who else cites this
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful HaqExplained¶8
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283 · Who else cites this
Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P.Affirmed¶11
Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2004 (57) ALR 290
Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.Affirmed¶11
2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kuldeep Singh Negi
State of U.P.
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
