Learned counsel for applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the F.I.R. for the same incident dated 14.7.2014 regarding which opposite party no.2 had filed complaint case no.750 of 2014, (copies collectively filed at A- 6) in which applicant and 4 others were summoned vide order dated 8.12.2014 passed by Magistrate; that in above complaint case applicant and co-accused persons were granted bail and they are facing trial since last last 5 years, which is likely to be decided in near future; that with same facts opposite party no.2 moved an application to National Human Rights Commission, New Delhi on 29.7.2014 on which F.I.R. has been registered on 18.7.2019 after a period of more than 5 years from the alleged incident dated 14.7.2014; that in complaint case the offence dated 14.7.2014 is alleged to have been committed by applicant and 4 others, in contradiction with which in F.I.R. based on complaint dated 29.7.2014 to Human Right Commission, offence is alleged to have been committed at the same place, time and date by applicant and one another leaving three accused of complaint case; that there are material contradictions in averment made in complaint and F.I.R.; that a person may
