Single-paragraph order disposing of a Section 482 application by applying the principles laid down in a contemporaneously rendered criminal revision decision.
Decision rendered in terms of the order in Criminal Revision No. 5683 of 2010 passed on the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3144 of 2020
Applicant :- N.K. Jalan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Saroj Kumar Dubey,Arun Kumar Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that controversy involved in the present petition is covered by the order passed today rendered in N.K. Jalan vs. State of U.P. and another (Criminal Revision No. 5683 of 2010), therefore, it is urged that the petition be decided in terms of the aforementioned decision.
Accordingly, application is disposed of in terms of the order passed today rendered in N.K. Jalan vs. State of U.P. and another (Criminal Revision No. 5683 of 2010).
Order Date :- 7.10.2020 Mukesh Kr.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
N.K. Jalan vs. State of U.P. and anotherApplied¶5
N.K. Jalan vs. State of U.P. and another (Criminal Revision No. 5683 of 2010)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.K. Jalan
State of U.P.
Suneet Kumar, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
