An application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 23117 of 2017 was dismissed for want of prosecution as applicants failed to appear despite multiple calls without seeking adjournment. Any interim order was vacated while the case was remitted to the court below.
Habitant fehlte; Antrage abgelehnt; Zwischenvorsorge aufheben.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23117 of 2017
Applicant :- Suhel @ Suhail Ahmad And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Harish Kumar Shukla,Chandra Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ravindra Prakash Srivastava
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Cause list has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicants inspite of repeated calls.
There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicants.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of this order be sent to the court concerned so that the case pending before the court below may proceed further in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 25.2.2020
Sanjeet
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suhel @ Suhail Ahmad And 5 Others
Om Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
