Dismissed
V.K. Tayal v. State of U.P
Allahabad HCA482/11661/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The application under Section 482 was dismissed on the submission of counsel that it was not pressed. Any interim order stood vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11661 of 2005
¶3
Applicant :- V.K. Tayal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- Heard Sri Raj Kumar, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
¶6
- Pursuant to this Court's order dated 07.02.2020 Sri Sharad Yadav, Sub Inspector, Police Station Jewar, District Gautambudh Nadar appeared and has also filed a counter affidavit placing on record material on the basis whereof supplementary charge sheet was submitted against applicant.
¶7
- At this stage, Sri Raj Kumar, learned counsel for applicant, stated that application may be dismissed as not pressed.
¶8
- Dismissed accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
¶9
Order Date :- 27.2.2020 AK
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
V.K. Tayal
- respondent
State Of U.P
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/11661/2005
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court