High Court dismissed plea under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash charge-sheet and cognizance order, holding FIR disclosed cognizable offence and no abuse of process was established.
Petition for quashing charge-sheet and cognizance order under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11157 of 2020
Applicant :- Saeed Ahmad And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Sisodia,Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
person seeking exercise of such inherent power, is required to show that there is harassment of any person by illegal prosecution.
Order Date :- 25.11.2020 Vikram/-A
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be invoked to quash proceedings where FIR discloses a cognizable offence but no abuse of process is shown.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Saeed Ahmad and 2 Others
State of U.P.
Pankaj Naqvi
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
