Held that there is no warrant to interfere with the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge vacating the temporary injunction in a suit regarding property rights, dismissing the writ petition under Article 227.
The writ petition was disposed of with the order refusing interference with the impugned appellate order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 65
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3438 of 2020
Petitioner :- Harsh Kumar And Another Respondent :- Satendra Kumar And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh,Ashish Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Chetan Chatterjee
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
passed by the appellate court), in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Order Date :- 17.12.2020 Atul
Digitally signed by Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh Date: 2020.12.19 15:57:09 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is warrant under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to interfere with the appellate court's order vacating the temporary injunction.
Harsh Kumar
Satendra Kumar
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
