Disposed
Shiv Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCA227/332/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 332…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 332…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 332 of 2019
Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr. Arun Srivastav,Shivajee Singh Sisodiya
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Shesh Nath Singh Yadav
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Learned counsel for both sides are present.
It has been mentioned that this proceeding is become infructuous because application moved under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. has been decided and against that order, a writ has been filed before this court and the same is pending.
Hence, any grievance is to be raised before that Court.
This fact could not be opposed by learned counsel for the applicant.
Hence, under all above facts, this proceeding ends as infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.1.2020 Kamarjahan
Shiv Kumar Singh
State of U.P.
Ram Krishna Gautam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court