Petitioner's counsel stated they do not wish to press the writ petition, leading to its dismissal as not pressed and vacation of interim order.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed. Interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1845 of 2017
Petitioner :- Smt. Sunita And 4 Othrs. Respondent :- M.A.C.T./Addl. Distt. Judge And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nigamendra Shukla
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
At the very outset, Shri Nigamendra Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that on instructions from his client, he does not want to press this writ petition.
In view of the aforesaid statement made by Shri Shukla, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 4.3.2020 LN Tripathi
Smt. Sunita And 4 Othrs.
M.A.C.T./Addl. Distt. Judge And 5 Others
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
