The High Court dismissed the writ petition as it had become infructuous by efflux of time because the prayer made by the petitioner was already granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 915 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ramesh Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Imtiyaj Ali,Murtuza Ali Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Shri R.R. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Murtuza Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Shri Nimai Dass, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
The prayer made by the petitioner has been granted and the matter has now become infructuous by efflux of time.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 15.3.2019 pks
Ramesh Singh
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
