Dismissed
M/S Panna Lal and Company v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Allahabad HCWTAX/56/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 56 of 2019 Petitioner…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 56 of 2019 Petitioner…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 56 of 2019
Petitioner :- M/S Panna Lal And Company Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankur Agarwal,Suyash Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.,Anant Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Sri Suyash Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned Counsel for the respondent-Union of India.
Learned Counsel for the respondent states that in compliance of the order dated 21.01.2019 the goods have been released. This fact has not been disputed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the above, this writ petition has become infrutuous.
It is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 22.2.2019 S.P.
M/S Panna Lal And Company
State Of U.P.
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court