The court dismissed the writ petition labeled as having no merit, indicating the petitioner's dispute could be addressed via an appeal if they are an aggrieved person.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 434 of 2019
Petitioner :- Mohd. Naheed Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Babul Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Chandrakesh Rai
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Shri B.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Nimai Dass, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
The petitioner was originally a complainant who came to this Court and got a direction. Now the direction has been followed. The petitioner is raising dispute of facts. If he is an aggrieved person at all, he can file an appeal before the appropriate authority.
This writ petition has no merit and it is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 5.4.2019 pks
Mohd. Naheed
State Of U.P.
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
