The petitioner challenged the rejection of their technical bid in an E-tender due to missing scanned security certificate. The court noted contradictions in the petitioner's submission regarding deposit methods but held that strict adherence to tender terms justified rejection, dismissing the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9885 of 2019
Petitioner :- M/S Shivam Traders Kanaujiya Ward Purwi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
that petitioner had duly complied with aforesaid condition. Hence, in our opinion petitioner's bid was rejected as per terms and conditions of tender.
Order Date :- 30.10.2019 Arshad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the rejection of the petitioner's technical bid due to non-submission of scanned security certificate violates terms of the E-tender.
Whether the contradiction in the petitioner's averments regarding deposit of security money justifies rejection of the bid.
M/S Shivam Traders Kanaujiya Ward Purwi
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
