The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous since the respondent-Contractor had satisfied all dues to the petitioners on 16.03.2011, leaving no substantive dispute for adjudication.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9608 of 2011
Petitioner :- M/S Aravali Marbales And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Tarun Gaur,Kumar Anish Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.N. Singh,V K Rai,Vimlesh Rai
Hon'ble Govind Mathur,Chief Justice Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Learned counsel for the respondents states that all the dues have already been satisfied by the respondent - Contractor on 16.03.2011.
In view of the fact that all dues have already been paid to the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for writ.
The writ petition, hence, is dismissed as becoming infructuous.
Order Date :- 6.3.2019 Shubham
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.) (Govind Mathur, C.J.)
M/S Aravali Marble
State Of U.P.
Govind Mathur
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
