The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order, if any, discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8178 of 2019
Petitioner :- M/S Swastik Construction Company Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Dayal Tiwari,Sri M D Singh Shekhar (Sr Advocate)
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Deo Prakash Singh,Om Prakash Singh,Rajendra Singh Chauhan,Sushil Kumar Rao
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Sri M.D. Singh Shekhar, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Ram Dayal Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner is present along with Sri Rajendra Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent no.6.
Sri M D Singh Shekhar, learned Senior Advocate states that the writ petition has become infructuous and it may be dismissed as such.
In view of the above the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 1.11.2019 Nadeem Ahmad
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
M/s Swastik Construction Company
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
