The petitioner did not appear to press the writ petition. The court found the matter infructuous due to afflux of time and the petitioner's lack of interest, subsequently dismissing the writ petition.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7897 of 2010
Petitioner :- Centre Superintendent/Principal C.R.S. Interm. College And Anr Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secr. Secondary Education And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- S. Shekhar,P.K. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
The matter is listed under the heading of 'likely to be infructuous' (without objection).
The matter is taken up in the revised call.
None appears to press the writ petition on behalf of the petitioners. The names of the learned counsel for the petitioners are shown in the cause list.
It appears that due to afflux of time, the matter has become infructuous and the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 3.7.2019 Ashish Tripathi
Centre Superintendent/Principal C.R.S. Interm. College And Anr
State Of U.P. Thru. Secr. Secondary Education And Anr
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
