The High Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner had an alternative remedy available under Section 28-A(4) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 before the Commissioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7226 of 2019
Petitioner :- Saddiq Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sufia Saba,Abdul Majeed Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Q.H.Siddiqui
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 5.3.2019 AK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Saddiq
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
