Petitioner claimed a plot possession dispute was resolved as respondent admitted handover undisputed. Court found no further cause of action and disposed of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 72255 of 2010
Petitioner :- Rakesh Seth Respondent :- Kanpur Devp. Authority And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Indra Dev,SC
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Supplementary counter affidavit filed today on behalf Kanpur Development Authority is taken on record.
Heard Sri Deepak Singh, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri P.K.Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Saurabh Srivastava, learned counsel for the contesting respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondent has averred in paragraph 7 of the supplementary counter affidavit that the possession of the plot in question has been handed over to the petitioner and same has not been disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of above, no further cause of action survives any more.
The writ petition is disposed of and consigned to record.
Order Date :- 10.12.2019 Sanjeev
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Rakesh Seth
Kanpur Devp. Authority
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
