Writ petition by petitioner challenging a demand notice for outstanding dues to Ghaziabad Development Authority. Court dismissed petition as no disputed facts warrant Article 226 interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7214 of 2019
Petitioner :- Suresh Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vrindavan Mishra
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 1.3.2019 PS
Suresh Sharma
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
