The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite notice and opportunity, with no substantive decision on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7133 of 2009
Petitioner :- Mehar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :-
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramendra Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition in spite of notice issued to him vide order dated 2.11.2018 and perused the office report dated 3.12.2018. However, Shri Alok Singh holding brief of Shri Ramendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 alongwith learned Standing Counsel are present.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 12.9.2019 Ravi Prakash
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Mehar Singh
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
