The court dismissed a writ petition contesting safety hazards from electrical installations, holding that the petitioner must pursue the alternative statutory remedy provided under Section 161 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
Petitioner's writ petition dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6556 of 2019
Petitioner :- Shiv Nath Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramakant Tiwari,Umesh Chandra Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kapil Dev Singh Rathore
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 KA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petition for intermediate remedy under Article 226 lies where alternative statutory remedy exists under Section 161 of Electricity Act, 2003.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shiv Nath Pandey
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
