Mahindra v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution after counsel for the petitioner failed to respond even to the revised call.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution after counsel for the petitioner failed to respond even to the revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 62592 of 2005
Petitioner :- Mahindra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Narayan Singh,D.B. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vk. Singh
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has not responded even in the revised call.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 11.9.2019
LA/-
Mahindra
State Of U.P.
Others
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court