Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution when petitioner's counsel stated they had no instruction in the matter. Interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 61293 of 2012
Petitioner :- Surendra Nath Singh Respondent :- Union Bank Of India And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- K.K. Mishra,Varun Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Agrawal
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri K.K.Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has no instruction in the matter.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 30.1.2019 SKM
(Dr. Y.K.Srivastava,J.) (Abhinava Upadhya,J.)
Surendra Nath Singh
Union Bank Of India
Abhinava Upadhya
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
