The petitioner failed to appear to press the writ petition. The court dismissed the matter for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 60376 of 2009
Petitioner :- Mohammad Farooq And Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.K. Gupta,J.P. Pandey,Pankaj Agrawal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,D. Vaish,Pankaj Agnihotri
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition.
Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.10.2019 Nitin Verma
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Mohammad Farooq And Ors.
State Of U.P. And Others
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
