The petitioner sought to delete the name of the Allahabad Development Authority from a surplus land entry and mutate her name as a subsequent purchaser. The Court held that once mutation occurred under the Act and original owner is absent with disputed facts, writ relief is impermissible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5983 of 2019 Petitioner :- Razia Mahboob Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Husain,Mansoor Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Devi Prasad Mishra
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 22.2.2019 KA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to stop mutation of land declared surplus under Urban Land Ceiling Act amidst disputed purchase rights.
Whether relief can be granted in a writ petition when the matter involves seriously disputed questions of fact requiring common law proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Razia Mahboob
State Of U.P.
Allahabad Development Authority
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
