This bench dismissed a writ petition maintaining that the cause of action did not survive as the tower in question was not operational.
Writ petition for writ dismissed on the ground that the tower is not operational.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5617 of 2019
Petitioner :- Praveen Sharma Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ratnesh Kumar Mishra,Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arvind Kumar Goswami
Hon'ble Govind Mathur,Chief Justice Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Vakalatnama filed today by Shri. Rahul Agarwal on behalf of respondent no.5 is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the respondent no.5 states that the tower in question is not at all operational and as such the cause sought to be agitated in the petition for writ does not survive.
In view of the statement given by the learned counsel for the respondent no.5, this petition for writ is absolutely of non consequence and hence the same is dismissed.
Order Date :- 6.3.2019 SB
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J) (Govind Mathur,C.J)
Praveen Sharma
State Of U P
Govind Mathur
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
