The High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the rejection of an application to hold a Ram Lila, holding that the writ had become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 51507 of 2009
Petitioner :- Sri Ram Lila Dashahara Mela Committee Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
The petitioner has challenged the order dated 22.09.2009, whereby his application dated 22.09.2009 was rejected, by which the petitioner had sought permission to hold the Ram Lila in the year 2009 at a particular place.
No one is present in the revised call. We have perused the material on the record with the assistance of Smt. Sarita Singh, learned Standing Counsel.
We find that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. Accordingly, it is dismissed.
Order Date :- 13.3.2019 SR
Sri Ram Lila Dashahara Mela Committee
State Of U.P.
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
