This writ petition was dismissed without hearing or arguments. The court observed no grounds for granting the relief sought to quash the impugned order. No interim order was enforced.
Writ petition dismissed and interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 48397 of 2007
Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Monika Sahai,Birendra Singh,D.P.Singh,Dr. V.K. Singh,Prakash Chandra,Sandeep Agarwal,V.K.Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,D.P.Singh
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Called in revise. None appeared to press the writ petition. In the circumstances, we ourselves have perused the record.
By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:
"i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of quashing the order dated 5.10.2004 passed by respondent no. 4 (Annexure no. 1 to this writ petition).
ii) to issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
Having gone through the entire writ petition, we do not find any ground entitling the petitioners for grant of any of above reliefs. No interference, therefore, is called for.
Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 1.5.2019
vinay
Arvind Kumar And Another
State Of U.P. And Others
Shashi Kant Gupta
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
