The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution during the revision hearing. Any interim order granted in the matter was vacated.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 47378 of 2012
Petitioner :- Narendra Kumar Chauhan Respondent :- Mahendra Pal Singh And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.M. Tripathi,S K Singh,S.K. Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- Chandrika Prasad,Rahul Sahai,S.C.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Called in revise. None appeared for the petitioner.
Sri Chandrika Prasad, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 6 and Sri Abhas Jaiswal, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rahul Sahai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.8 are present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 7.8.2019 Shahroz
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.)
Narendra Kumar Chauhan
Mahendra Pal Singh
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
