A writ petition called on for revision was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel was absent, and the court inferred the cause of action had ceased to exist or the matter was infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 45039 of 2000
Petitioner :- Awadh Bihari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- C.B.Yadav,Amit Shukla,M.K.Pandey,Nisheeth Yadav,Satrughan Yadav,U.N.Sharma,Vivekanand Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A P Srivastava,S.N.Singh,Shri Kant
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 3.7.2019 Manish Himwan
Awadh Bihari
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
