The writ petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear despite the respondent's counsel being present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 44824 of 2010 Petitioner :- Prasad Ganga Singh Respondent :- Union Bank Of India Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Narayan Singh, ,R.P.S. Chauhan,Sanjaymani Tripathi Counsel for :- Respondent B.N.Singh,G.P.Singh,SC,Shailesh Upadhyay Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
List has been revised. None appears to press this writ petition even though the learned counsel for the respondents is present.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for default.
Order Date :- 12.4.2019
MLK
Prasad Ganga Singh
Union Bank Of India
Shashi Kant Gupta
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
