Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to permit carry on of mining operation for alleged obstructed period after lease expiry. Court held that writ lies only upon statutory duty and observed no provision for such relief. Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39616 of 2018
Petitioner :- M/S Samrat Associates And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pratik Chandra,Rohit Sharan Tomar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 3.1.2019 KA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ of mandamus can be issued to permit mining operations after lease expiry where no legal provision exists.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs. Sunder Lal Jain and anotherReferred¶9
(2008) 2 SCC 280 · Who else cites this
Bihar Eastern Gangetic Fisherman Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs. Sipahi SinghReferred¶9
(1977) 4 SCC 145 · Who else cites this
Lekhraj Sathramdas Lalvani Vs. N.M. ShahReferred¶9
AIR 1966 SC 334 · Who else cites this
Dr. Uma Kant Saran Vs. State of BiharReferred¶9
1993(1) SCC 485 · Who else cites this
M/S Samrat Associates And 2 Others
State Of U P And 4 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
