The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and vacated any interim order. No substantive legal issue was addressed in this dismissal order.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37752 of 2009
Petitioner :- Asia Builders Chamanganj Kanpur Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Madhur Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Sri Madhur Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel are present.
Sri Madhur Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has become infructuous, hence the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 26.9.2019 Deepika
Asia Builders Chamanganj Kanpur
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
