A writ petition filed in the High Court was dismissed as infructuous due to the petitioner's counsel being absent. No argument was presented on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37078 of 2006
Petitioner :- Smt. Neetu Kumar Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.C. Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Tarun Varma
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 1.11.2019 YK
Smt. Neetu Kumar Singh
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
