The High Court disposed of a writ petition without adjudicating merits. Lamenting no petitioner appearance, the Court directed the Standing Counsel's statement regarding arm license evaluation.
Petition disposed of in light of the respondent's statement regarding a four-month timeline for disposal of the arm license application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35363 of 2019
Petitioner :- Mohammad Mustaqeem Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Although learned Standing Counsel is present, none has appeared for the petitioner.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent states that subject to verification of all facts, the application as made by the petitioner for grant of an arm license shall be duly evaluated and disposed of in accordance with law and preferably within a period of four months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order.
Accordingly and without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, this petition shall stand disposed of in light of the statement noted above.
Order Date :- 8.11.2019 Vivek Kr.
Mohammad Mustaqeem
State of U.P.
Another
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
