The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent and did not appear to press the case on the date of hearing.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30351 of 2013
Petitioner :- Smt. Veermati Respondent :- Addl. Collector Revenue And Finance And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Awadhesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,D.D. Chauhan
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
The case is called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 8.2.2019 Ashutosh Pandey
Smt. Veermati
Addl. Collector Revenue And Finance And 2 Ors.
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
