In this writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the matter has become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition accordingly and vacated any interim order if any.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29555 of 2008
Petitioner :- Balram And Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Mandhyan,Udai Chandani Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prabhakar Awasthi,Vivek Varma
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Sri Ashutosh Sharma, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Udai Chandani, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Sri Devendra Kumar Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State is present.
Order Date :- 7.11.2019 Nitin Verma
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Balram And Others
State of U.P. and Others
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
