The writ petition was dismissed as it was not pressed by the counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27157 of 2019
Petitioner :- Shyam Sundar Vishwakarma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhuwan Raj,Amit Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Bhuwan Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for State respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset submits that the he does not want to press the present writ petition and the same may be dismissed as such.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed without any further liberty.
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 22.8.2019/NS
Shyam Sundar Vishwakarma
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
