The project was dismissed as withdrawn by mutual agreement between the parties without any substantive order or legal principle being applied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22095 of 2019
Petitioner :- Samrin And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Om Narayan Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents on the basis of instructions points out that an FIR has already been registered against petitioner no.2.
In view of the aforesaid, Sri Yogendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents has no objection to the prayer so made.
As prayed, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 11.7.2019 Shahroz
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.)
Samrin
State Of U P
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
