The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear. Any interim order was vacated.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution and the interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16788 of 2013
Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Respondent :- Hari Singh And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.K. Gupta,Manoj Kumar Rai,Pankaj Agrawal Counsel for Respondent :- S.S. Nigam,S.C.,Virendra Singh
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
List has been revised. No one appears for the petitioner to press this writ petition. Sri Virendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 8.8.2019 Pratima
(Dr.Y.K.Srivastava,J.)
Pankaj Kumar
Hari Singh
Others
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
