Babu v. State of U P and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16459 of 2019…
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16459 of 2019…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16459 of 2019
Petitioner :- Babu Respondent :- State Of U P And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anjali Upadhya,Ramendra Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard Sri Shiv Kant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ramendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2.
By means of this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for allotment of 6% developed land, over and above the enhanced compensation which the petitioner has received as per the case of Gajraj and others vs. State of U.P. and others, reported in 2011(11) ADJ 1 .
The controversy raised in this writ petition has already been decided by a Division Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 07.11.2019, passed in Writ Petition No. 35693 of 2019 ( Smt. Maya Devi and others vs. State of U.P. and others), and the writ petition has been dismissed.
Since the dispute has already been decided by dismissing the writ petition, no relief can be granted to the petitioner in view of the aforesaid judgment.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 13.11.2019 Pkb/
(Prakash Padia, J.) (Abhinava Upadhya, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gajraj and othersReferred¶6
Gajraj and others vs. State of U.P. and others, reported in 2011(11) ADJ 1
Smt. Maya Devi and othersReferred¶7
Smt. Maya Devi and others vs. State of U.P. and others
Babu
State Of U P
Abhinava Upadhya
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court