The court directed that a specific case under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, be decided expeditiously within six months. The writ petition was subsequently disposed of.
Direction to decide Case No. 1 of 2016 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within six months from the date of the certified copy of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10481 of 2019
Petitioner :- Santosh Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Singh Kaushik,Manoj Kumar Keshari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The sole prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Case No. 1 of 2016 (Santosh Singh vs. Governor of U.P. and others), under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, be expeditiously decided within a stipulated period of time.
It is, therefore, directed that, as per the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, the Case No. 1 of 2016 (Santosh Singh vs. Governor of U.P. and others), under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, be decided within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 29.3.2019
praveen.
(Siddhartha Varma,J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Singh
State Of U.P
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
