This writ petition was dismissed as abated because respondents 2 and 3 had died, and the petitioner failed to file an affidavit verifying the death or bring heirs on record within the granted time.
The writ petition was dismissed as abated. Any interim order stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 22
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 9480 of 1983
Petitioner :- Prabhu Dayal Respondent :- D.D.C. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kunal Ravi Singh Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
The case has been listed under the heading 'group of cases likely to be infructuous' (without objection).
It was also reported by the office that the respondent nos. 2 & 3 have died. By the orders dated 22.7.2017 and 16.11.2017, the petitioner was granted time to verify the aforesaid fact. However, no affidavit has been filed for controverting the aforesaid report of the office and no application bringing on record the heirs of the deceased respondent nos. 2 & 3 has been filed.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as abated.
Interim order if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 24.1.2019 IB
Prabhu Dayal
D.D.C.
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
