Onkar Dutt v. D.D.C.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the petitioner or respondents. Any interim order is vacated.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 22
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 6677 of 1985
Petitioner :- Onkar Dutt Respondent :- D.D.C. Counsel for Petitioner :- T.C. Sharma,N.K. Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- S.S. Tyagi,S.C.
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List has been revised.
No one appeared either for the petitioner or the respondents.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 25.1.2019 Satyam
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Onkar Dutt
- respondent
D.D.C.
Coram
Salil Kumar Rai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/6677/1985
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court