Chhote Lal and 6 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioners requested their counsel not to press the writ petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed.
The petitioners requested their counsel not to press the writ petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2767 of 2019
Petitioner :- Chhote Lal And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohan Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
After some arguments, a request has been made by Sri Mohan Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners does not want to press the present writ petition.
In view of same, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 22.11.2019 Swati
Chhote Lal And 6 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court