The writ petition filed with liberty to file a better petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon acceptance of notice by the counsel for the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 913 of 2019
Petitioner :- Kamal Kant Pal And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vineet Kumar Singh,Arvind Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav,Gagan Mehta
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who has accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2, Sri A. K. Yadav, learned counsel, who has accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos.3 and 4 and Sri Gagan Mehta, who has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file better petition in future.
In view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file a fresh petition, if so advised.
Order Date :- 21.1.2019 Pramod Tripathi
Kamal Kant Pal And 7 Others
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
