The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Sanjiv Kumar against the Ghaziabad Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd. for want of prosecution due to non-appearance and lack of vakalatnama despite notice for substitution of counsel.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 77958 of 2005
Petitioner :- Sanjiv Kumar Respondent :- Ghaziabad Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd.Thru' Its Secy. & Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- M.K. Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,K.N. Mishra
Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.
Notice was issued by this Court earlier to the petitioner to engage another counsel.
The office has sent service report dated 3.1.2019, which says that neither unserved notice nor vakalatnama has been received in the office as yet. Service is deemed sufficient.
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 4.1.2019 Md Faisal
Sanjiv Kumar
Ghaziabad Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Thru' Its Secy. & Ors.
Sangeeta Chandra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
